🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, nations are pouring enormous sums into the concept of “sovereign AI” – building domestic artificial intelligence technologies. Starting with Singapore to the nation of Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are competing to create AI that comprehends local languages and cultural specifics.

The Worldwide AI Arms Race

This trend is a component of a larger worldwide race led by major corporations from the US and the People's Republic of China. While companies like OpenAI and Meta allocate substantial funds, middle powers are likewise taking sovereign bets in the AI field.

But amid such huge amounts involved, is it possible for less wealthy nations attain notable advantages? As noted by a analyst from a prominent policy organization, “Unless you’re a rich nation or a large firm, it’s quite a hardship to create an LLM from nothing.”

Security Considerations

A lot of nations are hesitant to rely on foreign AI technologies. In India, for instance, US-built AI solutions have occasionally proven inadequate. A particular example saw an AI assistant employed to instruct students in a isolated area – it spoke in English with a strong Western inflection that was difficult to follow for native students.

Then there’s the defence factor. For India’s security agencies, using specific foreign systems is considered not permissible. Per an entrepreneur noted, “It could have some unvetted data source that could claim that, for example, a certain region is separate from India … Utilizing that specific model in a military context is a major risk.”

He added, I’ve discussed with experts who are in defence. They want to use AI, but, disregarding particular tools, they don’t even want to rely on Western technologies because details may be transferred abroad, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

Homegrown Projects

As a result, several nations are funding national ventures. A particular such effort is being developed in India, where an organization is attempting to create a national LLM with public support. This project has dedicated about a substantial sum to AI development.

The developer envisions a model that is less resource-intensive than leading systems from Western and Eastern corporations. He states that the country will have to compensate for the resource shortfall with expertise. “Being in India, we don’t have the advantage of allocating billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we compete with such as the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the America is devoting? I think that is the point at which the core expertise and the strategic thinking plays a role.”

Native Focus

Across Singapore, a public project is funding machine learning tools developed in local local dialects. These tongues – including Malay, Thai, the Lao language, Indonesian, the Khmer language and additional ones – are commonly poorly represented in Western-developed LLMs.

I wish the individuals who are building these independent AI tools were aware of just how far and how quickly the cutting edge is progressing.

A senior director engaged in the project notes that these systems are intended to supplement more extensive AI, rather than replacing them. Tools such as ChatGPT and another major AI system, he comments, commonly find it challenging to handle local dialects and local customs – communicating in stilted Khmer, for instance, or proposing meat-containing dishes to Malaysian individuals.

Building regional-language LLMs allows state agencies to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “smart consumers” of a powerful tool built overseas.

He continues, I am cautious with the concept sovereign. I think what we’re trying to say is we want to be more adequately included and we wish to grasp the capabilities” of AI systems.

Multinational Cooperation

Regarding nations trying to carve out a role in an escalating global market, there’s another possibility: team up. Analysts connected to a prominent university recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative shared among a consortium of developing nations.

They term the proposal “a collaborative AI effort”, modeled after the European productive play to build a rival to Boeing in the 1960s. The plan would see the creation of a state-backed AI entity that would pool the capabilities of several states’ AI projects – for example the UK, the Kingdom of Spain, Canada, Germany, Japan, the Republic of Singapore, the Republic of Korea, the French Republic, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to establish a strong competitor to the Western and Eastern giants.

The main proponent of a paper setting out the proposal notes that the concept has drawn the interest of AI leaders of at least three nations so far, as well as several national AI firms. While it is now centered on “mid-sized nations”, less wealthy nations – Mongolia and the Republic of Rwanda among them – have also expressed interest.

He explains, Currently, I think it’s simply reality there’s less trust in the promises of the existing American government. Experts are questioning for example, is it safe to rely on such systems? In case they decide to