🔗 Share this article

T respite resulting from the ceasefire in Gaza is substantial. In Israel, the release of the living hostages has resulted in extensive joy. In Gaza and the West Bank, celebrations have commenced as approximately 2,000 Palestinian detainees are being freed – even as anguish lingers due to doubt about who is being freed and where they will be sent. Across northern Gaza, residents can at last return to search the debris for the remains of an approximated 10,000 those who have disappeared.

Ceasefire Emergence Contrary to Previous Doubts

As recently as three weeks ago, the likelihood of a ceasefire seemed unlikely. Yet it has been implemented, and on Monday Donald Trump departed Jerusalem, where he was applauded in the Knesset, to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. There, he participated in a high-powered diplomatic gathering of more than 20 world leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer. The peace initiative begun there is due to be continued at a assembly in the UK. The US president, working alongside international partners, managed to secure this deal happen – regardless of, not owing to, Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Palestinian Statehood Hopes Tempered by Historical Realities

Hopes that the deal marks the first step toward Palestinian statehood are comprehensible – but, considering historical precedent, somewhat optimistic. It offers no clear path to self-rule for Palestinians and risks dividing, for the foreseeable future, Gaza from the West Bank. Furthermore the utter devastation this war has produced. The absence of any schedule for Palestinian autonomy in the presidential proposal gives the lie to self-aggrandizing mentions, in his Knesset speech, to the “monumental start” of a “era of prosperity”.

The American leader could not help himself polarising and individualizing the deal in his speech.

In a period of relief – with the hostage release, truce and renewal of aid – he chose to recast it as a ethical drama in which he exclusively restored Israel’s honor after purported betrayal by past US commanders-in-chief Obama and Biden. This even as the Biden administration twelve months prior having tried a analogous arrangement: a ceasefire linked to aid delivery and ultimate diplomatic discussions.

Meaningful Agency Vital for Legitimate Peace

A initiative that refuses one side substantive control cannot produce authentic resolution. The halt in hostilities and humanitarian convoys are to be applauded. But this is not yet policy development. Without mechanisms ensuring Palestinian involvement and control over their own organizations, any deal risks cementing oppression under the discourse of peace.

Humanitarian Priorities and Reconstruction Challenges

Gaza’s people urgently require humanitarian aid – and sustenance and pharmaceuticals must be the primary focus. But restoration must not be delayed. Within 60 million tonnes of debris, Palestinians need help restoring residences, schools, hospitals, mosques and other establishments devastated by Israel’s military operation. For Gaza’s interim government to succeed, funding must be disbursed rapidly and security gaps be filled.

Like much of Donald Trump's resolution initiative, allusions to an international stabilisation force and a proposed “diplomatic committee” are worryingly ambiguous.

International Support and Prospective Outcomes

Strong international support for the Gaza's governing body, permitting it to replace Hamas, is likely the most promising scenario. The immense hardship of the recent period means the moral case for a solution to the conflict is potentially more urgent than ever. But while the truce, the return of the captives and pledge by Hamas to “remove weapons from” Gaza should be acknowledged as positive steps, the president's record provides scant basis to believe he will fulfill – or consider himself obligated to endeavor. Short-term relief does not mean that the possibility of a Palestinian state has been advanced.